wo jun 24, 2015 3:46 pm
kaasje schreef:Maurits schreef:kaasje schreef:Ahaa heb een keer dat microdosen met LSD geprobeerd, maar dat liep toch niet zoals gepland haha.
Het was toch nog net iets te hoog gedoseerd denk ik, want men pupillen waren weer zwarte gaten en ik had beginnende visuals, niet zo handig tijdens een normale weekdag.
Weet je nog hoeveel ug je toen slikte?
Ik denk rond de 40
wo jun 24, 2015 10:07 pm
do jun 25, 2015 5:13 pm
do jun 25, 2015 5:35 pm
wo jul 13, 2022 2:12 am
FranX schreef:Toch is niet iedereen eens over het idee en zou mircodosing LSD als het al iets brengt negatief zijn.![]()
http://www.gwern.net/LSD%20microdosing
another blinded experiment of placebo/6.5–26μg (Bershadet al2019) found some subjectively-reported mood effects but no effect on several cognitive measures (RAT, dual n-back, & Digit Symbol Substitution Task)
(For example, LSD began commercial distribution in 1947; from 1948–2014, there were ~264 science Nobel Prizes excluding Literature/Peace/Economics, hence one might expect ~13–26 Nobelists to have used LSD at some point in their lifetime if they used at a similar rate as the general population, and much more if LSD did contribute to key creative breakthroughs especially given the tail effects, but as far as I know the only science Nobelists who have ever admitted—or even been said to have used LSD in some way possibly related to any important work—are 3 in number: Richard Feynman, Kary Mullis for PCR, and possibly Francis Crick for DNA. So if one wishes to reason from anecdotes like them (generously assuming those stories are true), one might conclude that psychedelics usage reduces your ability to make scientific discoveries